Tips for searching:
• You have to select a product and type at least 2 words to activate the search
• Use only words that are specific to the information you are looking for
• Avoid typing questions or sentences
Please do not use this field to report adverse events or product complaints. Adverse events and product complaints should be reported. Reporting forms and information can be found at www.mhra.gov.uk/yellowcard or search for MHRA Yellow card in the Google play or Apple app store. Adverse events and product complaints should also be reported to Lilly: please call Lilly UK on 01256 315 000.
Emgality ® ▼ (galcanezumab)
This information is intended for UK registered healthcare professionals only as a scientific exchange in response to your search for information. For current prescribing information for all Lilly products, including Summaries of Product Characteristics, Patient Information Leaflets and Instructions for Use, please visit: www.medicines.org.uk (England, Scotland, Wales) or www.emcmedicines.com/en-GB/northernireland/ (Northern Ireland).
Can Emgality® (galcanezumab) be used in patients with comorbid cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular risk?
There were no differences in TEAEs, SAEs, or increase in concomitant CV medication use between CV disease risk groups in the galcanezumab phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled migraine prevention studies.
Content overview
- Evaluation of cardiovascular safety in galcanezumab phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled migraine prevention studies
- Were patients with comorbid CV conditions and CV risk included in the phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled migraine prevention studies?
- Description of analysis set
- CV treatment-emergent adverse events observed between CV disease risk groups
- Reported serious adverse events or discontinuations due to CV TEAEs
- Concomitant CV medications use by CV disease risk groups
- Exposure-adjusted incidence rates
- References
- Appendix
Evaluation of cardiovascular safety in galcanezumab phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled migraine prevention studies
Cardiovascular (CV) safety was carefully evaluated as calcitonin gene-related peptide is
- recognized as a potent microvascular vasodilator, and
- hypothesized to play a protective role in CV health.1
Furthermore, observational studies have reported increased relative risks for CV events in the migraine population compared to the nonmigraine population. These events included
- ischemic stroke
- transient ischemic attack
- ischemic heart disease, and
- myocardial infarction.2-6
Were patients with comorbid CV conditions and CV risk included in the phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled migraine prevention studies?
The phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled migraine prevention studies included patients with
- comorbid CV conditions, and
- CV risk.7
However, to minimize confounding at the case level and improve interpretation of the CV data, patients with acute CV events and/or serious CV risk were excluded from the clinical studies.
A patient had a baseline CV disease risk of
- "yes" if they had 1 or more conditions that were part of the patients’ medical history or preexisting conditions using broad and narrow terms from the Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities (MedDRA) standardized MedDRA queries (SMQs), or
- "no" if they did not have any of the preferred terms (PTs) in the MedDRA SMQs as a preexisting condition or medical history event.8
Patients were excluded from phase 3, migraine prevention study enrollment if they met any of the following criteria at screening:
- electrocardiograms (ECGs) showing abnormalities compatible with acute CV events or serious CV risk, including, but not limited to a corrected QT (QTcB [Bazett's]) interval >470 ms for women and >450 ms for men
- history of myocardial infarction, unstable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention, coronary artery bypass graft, or deep vein thrombosis/pulmonary embolism within 6 months of screening
- planned CV surgery or percutaneous coronary angioplasty
- stroke within 6 months of screening (EVOLVE-1), or
- a lifetime history of stroke (EVOLVE-2 and REGAIN).7,8
Framingham Risk Score (FRS) was also evaluated in the phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled migraine prevention studies. More information on FRS can be found in the Appendix.
Description of analysis set
The CV safety profile of galcanezumab was evaluated in phase 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in adult patients for the prevention of
This pooled analysis of 2886 adult patients included a total of 1435 patients who received monthly doses of galcanezumab (120 mg or 240 mg) administered subcutaneously.12
The majority of patients were female (>80%) and Caucasian (>75%), with a mean age of 41 to 42 years.12
Baseline cardiovascular disease characteristics in phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled migraine prevention studies
A total of 17.21% of patients were identified to be in the CV disease risk "yes" subgroup across galcanezumab treatment groups: CV Disease Risk Group - Phase 3, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Migraine Prevention Trials.8,12
Subgroups |
PBO |
GMB 120 mg |
GMB 240 mg |
GMB Pooled |
Yes |
269 (18.5) |
123 (17.5) |
124 (17.0) |
247 (17.2) |
No |
1182 (81.5) |
582 (82.6) |
606 (83.0) |
1188 (82.8) |
Abbreviations: CV = cardiovascular; GMB = galcanezumab; MedDRA = Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; PBO = placebo; SMQ = standard MedDRA query.
aA patient had a baseline CV disease risk of "yes" if they had 1 or more conditions that were part of the patients’ medical history or preexisting conditions using broad and narrow terms from MedDRA SMQs, and "no" if they did not have any of the preferred terms in the MedDRA SMQs as a preexisting condition or medical history event.
The most common conditions in the CV risk "yes" subgroup for this pooled analysis set (galcanezumab pooled and placebo, respectively) were
- hypertension (41.7% vs 50.2%)
- hypercholesterolemia (25.9% vs 14.1%)
- hyperlipidemia (19.0% vs 19.0%)
- type 2 diabetes (7.3% vs 7.4%)
- cholesterol increased (6.5% vs 4.5%), and
- dyslipidemia (4.9% vs 8.2%).8
Back to Content overview.
CV treatment-emergent adverse events observed between CV disease risk groups
There were no significant differences in CV treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) observed between the CV disease risk subgroups (CV TEAEs in CVD Risk Group: Phase 3, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Migraine Prevention Trials).8,13
Subgroups |
PBO |
GMB 120 mg |
GMB 240 mg |
Yes |
11/269 (4.1) |
2/123 (1.6) |
4/124 (3.2) |
No |
16/1182 (1.4) |
10/582 (1.7) |
9/606 (1.5) |
Abbreviations: CV = cardiovascular; CVD = cardiovascular disease; GMB = galcanezumab; PBO = placebo; TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event.
Reported serious adverse events or discontinuations due to CV TEAEs
There were no significant differences between galcanezumab and placebo in the frequency of CV serious adverse events (SAEs) or discontinuations due to CV TEAEs.7,8,12
There were 3 CV SAEs each in the
- galcanezumab 240 mg (acute myocardial infarction, transient ischemic attack, pulmonary embolism), and
- placebo (pulmonary embolism, deep vein thromboembolism, myocardial infarction) groups.8,12
All the CV SAEs in the galcanezumab-treated patients resolved.12 Based on similarities in the type, frequency, and time of onset of these events from study treatment between patients treated with galcanezumab and placebo, the events were not considered to be related to galcanezumab treatment.7,8
The 3 patients with CV SAEs in the galcanezumab 240-mg group were in the "no" CV disease-risk group.7
Of the 3 patients in the placebo group with CV SAEs,
- patients who reported myocardial infarction and deep vein thrombosis were in the CV disease-risk "yes" subgroup, and
- the patient who reported pulmonary embolism was in the CV disease-risk "no" subgroup.7
Concomitant CV medications use by CV disease risk groups
The use of CV medications was evaluated including
- antihypertensives
- antiarrhythmics
- antithrombotics, and
- antianginals.8
The proportion of patients taking these medications at baseline and any change in postbaseline use was summarized. Postbaseline change was defined as
- initiation of a new treatment, or
- a dose increase in an existing treatment.8
Any CV medications whose indication for use was "primary study condition" were removed as many of the CV medications are used for migraine treatment (eg, beta blockers and calcium channel blockers).7
There was no difference in the increase of concomitant CV medications between CV disease risk subgroups.7,8
Dose Increase or New Start of CV Concomitant Medications - Phase 3, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled, Migraine Prevention Analysis Set summarizes the increase in CV concomitant medications during the double-blind treatment phase by CV disease risk group.8
Medication Group |
All Patients PBO (%) |
All Patients |
CV Disease Risk "Yes" Group PBO (%) |
CV Disease Risk "Yes" Group GMB Pooled (%) |
CV Disease Risk Group "No" PBO (%) |
CV Disease Risk "No" Group GMB Pooled (%) |
Antihypertensivesa |
2.3 |
1.6 |
7.8 |
4.1 |
1.1 |
1.1 |
Antiarrhythmics |
0.6 |
0.1 |
1.9 |
0.0 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
Antianginals |
0.2 |
0.0 |
0.7 |
0.0 |
0.1 |
0.0 |
Antithrombotics |
1.3 |
1.4 |
1.5 |
1.2 |
1.3 |
1.4 |
Abbreviations: CV = cardiovascular; GMB = galcanezumab; GMB Pooled = GMB 120 mg and GMB 240 mg pooled; PBO = placebo.
aAntihypertensives were not allowed for the acute treatment of migraine headaches during the phase 3 migraine prevention studies. Migraine preventives were not allowed at any time in EVOLVE-1 and EVOLVE-2; in REGAIN, up to 1/3 of enrolled patients were allowed to continue migraine prophylactic treatment with propranolol if the patient had been on a stable dose for at least 2 months prior to baseline and the dosing remained stable throughout the double-blind treatment period.
Back to Content overview.
Exposure-adjusted incidence rates
Exposure-adjusted incidence rates (EAIRs) are a measure of whether TEAEs occur at an increased frequency with increased treatment duration.7
There were no significant differences between any galcanezumab dose group and placebo in the EAIRs across the 9 SMQs and associated PTs that were used to assess baseline CV risk. The EAIRs for SMQs that can be related to ischemic events are provided below: Exposure-Adjusted SMQs for TEAEs Likely CV in Nature per Medical Review – Ischemic-Related Events: Phase 3, Placebo-Controlled, Migraine Prevention Analysis Set.7
PBO |
GMB 120 mg |
GMB 240 mg |
GMB Pooled |
|
Embolic and thrombotic events |
0.75 |
0.00 |
1.49 |
0.75 |
Ischemic heart disease |
0.19 |
0.37 |
0.37 |
0.37 |
Abbreviations: CV = cardiovascular; GMB = galcanezumab; GMB Pooled = GMB 120 mg and GMB 240 mg pooled; MedDRA = Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities; PBO = placebo; SMQ = standard MedDRA query; TEAE = treatment-emergent adverse event.
aOne hundred times the number of patients experiencing the event divided by event-specific total patient-year at risk.
Back to Content overview.
References
1Russell FA, King R, Smillie SJ, et al. Calcitonin gene-related peptide: physiology and pathophysiology. Physiol Rev. 2014;94(4):1099-1142. http://dx.doi.org/10.1152/physrev.00034.2013
2Peng KP, Chen YT, Fuh JL, et al. Migraine and incidence of ischemic stroke: a nationwide population-based study. Cephalalgia. 2017;37(4):327-335. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102416642602
3Becker C, Brobert GP, Almqvist PM, et al. Migraine and the risk of stroke, TIA, or death in the UK (CME). Headache. 2007;47(10):1374-1384. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1526-4610.2007.00937.x
4Kurth T, Gaziano JM, Cook NR, et al. Migraine and risk of cardiovascular disease in women. JAMA. 2006;296(3):283-291. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.296.3.283
5Sacco S, Ornello R, Ripa P, et al. Migraine and risk of ischaemic heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Eur J Neurol. 2015;22(6):1001-1011. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ene.12701
6Mahmoud AN, Mentias A, Elgendy AY, et al. Migraine and the risk of cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events: a meta-analysis of 16 cohort studies including 1 152 407 subjects. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e020498. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-020498.
7Data on file, Eli Lilly and Company and/or one of its subsidiaries.
8Oakes TM, Kovacs R, Rosen N, et al. Evaluation of cardiovascular outcomes in adult patients with episodic or chronic migraine treated with galcanezumab: data from three phase 3, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled EVOLVE-1, EVOLVE-2, and REGAIN studies. Headache. 2020;60(1):110-123. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/head.13684
9Stauffer VL, Dodick DW, Zhang Q, et al. Evaluation of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: the EVOLVE-1 randomized clinical trial. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75(9):1080-1088. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2018.1212
10Skljarevski V, Matharu M, Millen BA, et al. Efficacy and safety of galcanezumab for the prevention of episodic migraine: results of the EVOLVE-2 phase 3 randomized controlled clinical trial. Cephalalgia. 2018;38(8):1442-1454. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0333102418779543
11Detke HC, Goadsby PJ, Wang S, et al. Galcanezumab in chronic migraine: the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled REGAIN study. Neurology. 2018;91(24):e2211-e2221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000006640
12Bangs ME, Kudrow D, Wang S, et al. Safety and tolerability of monthly galcanezumab injections in patients with migraine: integrated results from migraine clinical studies. BMC Neurol. 2020;20(1):25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-020-1609-7
13Oakes TM, Kovacs R, Rosen N, et al. Evaluation of cardiovascular risks in patients treated with longer-term exposure to galcanezumab. Poster presented at: 73rd American Academy of Neurology (AAN Virtual); April 17-22, 2021.
14D’Agostino RB, Vasan RS, Pencina MJ, et al. General cardiovascular risk profile for use in primary care. Circulation. 2008;117(6):743-753. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.699579
Appendix
Framingham risk score
The FRS is a gender-specific algorithm used to estimate the 10-year CV risk of an individual.14
Framingham risk score in the migraine prevention studies
Comparison of baseline FRSs showed higher mean and median scores in the "yes" subgroup compared to the "no" subgroup for both men and women across placebo and galcanezumab dose groups.7
The majority of women in the pooled analysis (total women) including those in the CV disease risk "yes" subgroup had a minimal (≤1.0%) 10-year risk of coronary heart disease. However, within the "yes" subgroup, the maximum FRS was 20 with a 75th percentile of 11, indicating increased risk for a small proportion of women in the group with CV disease risk.7
For all men, as well as those in the "yes" subgroup, the 10-year risk was higher, between 5.0% and 11.0%, and much higher for the smaller subgroup of men with scores higher than the 75th percentile.7
The Framingham data affirm the CV disease risk subgroup approach for identifying patients with CV disease risk and indicate a potentially higher 10-year risk for coronary heart disease in the "yes" subgroup, particularly in males.7
▼ This medicinal product is subject to additional monitoring. This will allow quick identification of new safety information. Healthcare professionals are asked to report any suspected adverse reactions.
Date of Last Review: 05 January 2023